Skip to content
X Facebook YouTube Email
MFG Accountability Project
  • Blog
  • Press Statements
  • News
  • ResourcesExpand
    • About the Litigation
    • Case Tracker
    • Before You Sue
    • Beyond the Courtroom
  • Endorsers
  • About Us
MFG Accountability Project
Home / Featured /

S&P Global Energy Evolution: Are The Courts An Effective Tool for Climate Action?

November 22, 2024November 22, 2024 Reading Time: 1 minute

In this episode of the Energy Evolution Podcast, host Taylor Kuykendall discusses climate litigation with legal experts Hannah Weisman, a professor of law at Penn State University, and Phil Goldberg, special counsel with the Manufacturers Accountability Project.

Weisman argues that litigation is a crucial avenue for accountability in the face of legislative inaction on climate change, while Goldberg contends that courts lack the tools to effectively address broader policy issues and that litigation may divert attention from meaningful legislative solutions. The conversation highlights the differing perspectives on the role of the judiciary in climate action, with Weisman emphasizing the urgency of the crisis and Goldberg cautioning against using the courts as a primary mechanism for policy change.

Listen to the full podcast here.

Energy Evolution

Post navigation

Previous Previous
Baltimore Sun Op-Ed: Manufacturers Aren’t A Rainy Day Fund for Government
NextContinue
MAP Statement on Maine Climate Suit

Join Our Newsletter!

Get the latest email updates from the Manufacturers’ Accountability Project.

© 2025 MFG Accountability Project
a project of National Association of Manufacturers
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Contact Us

  • Blog
  • Press Statements
  • News
  • Resources
    • About the Litigation
    • Case Tracker
    • Before You Sue
    • Beyond the Courtroom
  • Endorsers
  • About Us
Search