The flaws of municipal litigation to combat climate change was the theme of the June 15 Washington Legal Foundation webinar, which was titled “Climate Change Regulation by Litigation: Wise Use, or Misuse, of State and Local Resources.” The panel discussion featured MAP Special Counsel Phil Goldberg, who focused on the lack of any legal or ….
Read More »
A menu of public policy options and private sector-led solutions exist to reduce carbon emissions. That was the central takeaway according to a panel of experts who participated in a May 18th panel hosted by the Georgetown University Center for Business and Public Policy. The panel, which included speakers with legal, legislative, and regulatory backgrounds, ….
Read More »
On May 5th, a Pennsylvania appellate court unanimously held that the tort of public nuisance does not make product manufacturers liable for downstream risks associated with products. The decision carries important implications for public nuisance litigation against manufacturers of products in other sectors, including in climate litigation. In the case, Atlantic Richfield Company, et al. ….
Read More »
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County and related petitions asking the Court to review federal appellate court rulings that sent climate tort lawsuits against American energy producers to state court. MAP Special Counsel Phil Goldberg pointed out in a statement reacting ….
Read More »
RealClear Energy recently published an op-ed by Phil Goldberg, special counsel to the Manufacturers’ Accountability Project. The Supreme Court is considering whether to hear cases regarding the proper jurisdiction for climate lawsuits—federal or state court. Goldberg’s op-ed details the history of this litigation campaign; he noted previous administrations’ positions and past federal court decisions substantiating ….
Read More »
Over the past several months, the National Association of Manufacturers has filed amicus briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court, where many of the climate cases are now being appealed on the question of whether climate lawsuits against oil and gas companies should be heard in federal or state court. The Court has not decided whether ….
Read More »
The U.S. Supreme Court has asked the U.S. Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the United States’ views as to whether the Court should grant review of Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County. As explained in a recent MAP Legal Backgrounder, the petition asks the Court to decide ….
Read More »
On October 27, Pepperdine University’s School of Public Policy assembled a panel of experts to discuss and debate the shortcomings and merits of municipal climate litigation. This event, titled “Municipal Climate Litigation in California: Should the Courts or Policymakers Address Climate-Related Damages and Solutions?” was moderated by Pete Peterson, Dean of the School of Public ….
Read More »
Boulder and a few other local governments in Colorado are suing Suncor USA and ExxonMobil in state court, trying to hold the two companies legally liable for causing climate change and make them pay for infrastructure improvements in these localities. This lawsuit is part of a coordinated national litigation campaign, with about two dozen similar ….
Read More »
The American Tort Reform Association recently issued a report highlighting one of the more concerning aspects of the climate litigation campaign waged by plaintiffs’ lawyers and public officials against energy manufacturers. Privately funded lawyers are being paid to serve in attorney general offices around the country despite the many ethical issues raised by such arrangements. ….
Read More »